It was the final legislative hurdle for a bill the lower house passed in December.
The vote follows months of debate that pitted so-called zoophiles against animal rights and protection advocates. Sexual mores seemed not to play a paramount role.
The ban, which carries only a misdemeanour charge, is an amendment to the country's animal protection law, which, among other things, regulates animal testing and the sale of animals, and prohibits animal abuse, including ''using an animal for personal sexual activities or making them available to third parties for sexual activities and thereby forcing them to behave in ways that are inappropriate to their species''.
Advertisement
Zoophiles argue that their relationships with their pets, or ''partners'' as they prefer, are entirely mutual. Michael Kiok, a co-director of Zoophilic Engagement for Tolerance and Enlightenment (ZETA), said animals were perfectly capable of expressing whether or not they desired sex.
Animal-rights groups have criticised the move. But David Zimmermann, who is also a co-director of ZETA, said: ''It's a sexual aspect that is entirely foreign to most people. They just see a man and think, 'What terrible things is he doing to that dog?'''
Mr Zimmermann had a Great Dane with which he occasionally had sex but it died four months ago, he said. Now he lives with his similarly zoophilic boyfriend and their celibate Dalmatian.
''For me, she's just a good friend that I care about very, very much. There's no sex,'' he said.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
please leave your opinion about his blog ,
this will help us to give some more quality information.